According to Wikipedia, the UK prison population in 
2014 is 81,905 men and 3,956 women (I have not checked the source of their 
statistics, but that sounds about right. The number of men in prison has 
increased massively over the last thirty years since I studied criminology, but 
the number of women in prison appears to be roughly the same 
order).
To answer the question whether too many wome go to 
jail, there are two issues:
1) Are women treated differently to men for the 
same offences and
2) Are custodial sentances in general used too 
frequently.
In terms of the first of these questions, one has 
to compare like for like crimes and those depend on the severity of the 
crimes.
To take an extreme example, if someone commits 
murder, there is a 95% chance that they will be caught, prosecuted, convicted 
and sentanced to the mandatory sentance of life in prison irrespective of their 
gender.
I have not studied the criminology research, but 
certainly there are more men in jail because they are much more likely to commit 
violent crimes and crimes against property. I believe most women are jailed 
because they are recidivists or repeat offenders of minor theft, fraud and drugs 
offences.
To find a comparitive offence, one must look at low 
value fraud or theft.
To decide whether woman are treated equally to men, 
the questions are:
1) Are they more or less likely to be caught and 
prosecuted: I do not know if the police are more likely to caution women or 
whether the CPS are less likely to prosecute women for a crime compared to men 
commiting an equivalent crime.
2) If they are prosecuted, are they more likely to 
be convicted (Alexandra suggests that they are and suggests that this is 
possibly because judges feel that women 'should know better' and because judges 
are mostly men) The judges I know are women, but they might actually be harder 
on women for similar reasons. However the proportion of women convicted 
could also be due to the CPS only prosecuting offences against women where they 
are certain of the result because the risk of a woman reoffending after only a 
caution is less.
3) If they are found guilty, are they more likely 
to be given a custodial sentance: again, I have not looked at the research which 
must have been done, but in sentancing judges take into account the stability of 
the offender's life, the amount of support a person have and the effect on their 
family life and on their family - particularly if they are a 
primary carer. Hence, most of the women who are sent to jail are not there 
because they have carried out violent crimes, but because they are repeat 
offenders (and often if they are guilty of minor thefts, this is usually because 
of drug problems).
Obviously, there is likely to be acasemic research 
on all of these questions and I would not like to take a view one way or another 
without looking at it.
The second question of whether too many people are 
sent to jail, I would argue that the answer is yes. All of the political parties 
in an effort to appear tough on crime have criminalised more behavour, put 
pressure on judges to give more severe sentances and brought in minimum 
sentances for some offences. The increase in the number of people in prison is a 
scandal. The number of people who are aging and kept in jail, have drug 
problems, have mental health problems and are former members of the armed forces 
not given adequate support all provide reasons for concern.
The issue of mental health problems and issues with 
drugs covers most of the women in prison; these would have much 
better out comes if given treatment and support rather than 
incarceration.
Finally the idea that people should be jailed for 
non-payment of licence fees is absurd. The licence fee is collected for a 
non-state body even though it's collection has statutory force. (I believe 
non-payment does not even count as a criminal offence.)
-----Eamon emailed the blog and got included. Because its a very relevant subject  
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment